The Economics of Affordable Housing: Why Uniform Renewed Hope Housing Pricing Is Bound To Fail in Lagos & Abuja.

The Two Faces of Every City

Every thriving city tells two stories: one of opportunity and another of inequality.

In Lagos and Abuja, Nigeria’s most prosperous urban centres, it’s not uncommon to find luxury apartments rising beside neighbourhoods struggling to afford rent. This contrast reflects a deeper economic paradox: where wealth concentrates, poverty intensifies.

But when we talk about affordable housing, we often miss the point. It’s not just about “building more houses” or “making prices cheaper.” It’s about understanding the spectrum of human need, the economics that drive policy, and the balancing act governments face between social good and financial sustainability.

‍

Understanding the Housing Spectrum

Let’s start with a simple framework, the Housing Spectrum: an eight-tier model that captures the range of living situations people occupy, from the most vulnerable to the most secure. Across this spectrum, each level speaks to more than just shelter. It reflects economic capacity, access, and opportunity.
‍

‍

The Government’s Balancing Act

For governments, housing is both a social responsibility and an economic lever. Providing affordable housing helps citizens stabilise. Which, in turn, helps them become more productive contributors to the economy.

It’s a cycle of mutual benefit: Affordable housing → Stability → Productivity → National growth.

But here’s where it gets complicated: governments don’t have infinite resources. They must act strategically. Deciding who to help first and how to sustain the system long-term. To achieve this, many governments (including Nigeria’s) approach housing as an “investment portfolio.”

Each project must balance cost, turnover, and return on investment (ROI). The logic is simple: invest in people who can quickly repay or sustain their housing so that the returns can be reinvested into new projects.

‍

When “Affordable” Isn’t Affordable

Take Lagos or Abuja as case studies. Imagine a one-bedroom flat priced at ₦8.5 million, supposedly “affordable.” Now imagine that the land alone costs more than the flat itself.

That’s the economic reality of high-demand cities. Add to that the higher median income, higher cost of materials, and higher subsidies required to offset urban inflation. You’ll see why a single national pricing model can’t work.

What’s affordable in Ibadan or Osogbo becomes nearly impossible in Lagos or Abuja. So, when we talk about “national affordable housing programs,” we have to admit: affordability is relative.

‍

The Business of Housing (and Why It’s Necessary)

It’s easy to say, “Government should build more houses.” But housing isn’t just social infrastructure; it’s also a business ecosystem.

Every project requires:

• Land acquisition (which is already costly in urban centres)
• Design, construction, and compliance costs
• Long-term maintenance and community integration
  
  

If the state can’t sustain these costs or generate returns, the program collapses, leaving behind abandoned estates and failed interventions.

So yes, housing is welfare, but it’s also a revolving investment cycle. A functional, affordable housing system is one that doesn’t rely on endless subsidies but on sustainable reinvestment.

‍

Why “One Size Fits All” Fails

Uniform pricing across cities ignores local realities. In Lagos and Abuja, the cost of land, labour, and logistics makes housing inherently more expensive. So when the government fixes a single “affordable” rate for the entire country, it inevitably prices out the very people it’s meant to help in the most expensive regions.

To fix this, housing policies must become data-driven and built on an understanding of:

• Local earning capacities
• Cost-of-living variations
• Land market dynamics
• Real household demand

Without this, affordability remains an illusion.

‍

A Smarter Way Forward

Affordable housing shouldn’t be treated as charity. It’s a strategic investment in national stability and productivity. To make it work, Nigeria needs to:

1. Collect and integrate data on income, land cost, and household needs.
2. Adopt region-specific pricing models based on real market conditions.
3. Encourage community-led and cooperative housing models that lower entry barriers.
4. Reinvest housing profits back into affordable schemes for the next cycle of citizens.

When citizens are stable, economies thrive. When economies thrive, cities grow sustainably. Affordable housing is not a favour to the poor. It’s a foundation for collective progress.

‍

Conclusion

We can’t fix the housing crisis with blanket solutions. The answer lies in precision. That is, understanding that Lagos’s problems are not Ibadan’s problems, and Abuja’s numbers don’t represent Nigeria. It’s time to rethink affordability as a dynamic, data-driven ecosystem, one that balances social inclusion with economic logic.

Because at the end of the day, the cost of living is not just a number. It’s a measure of how much a society values its people.