How to Solve a Housing Crisis: A Study of Amsterdam's Houthavens

Oftentimes, we get distracted with the 'we vs them' debate on how real estate developers have contributed to the cost of housing. But before choosing a side or making an augment for why we should or shouldn't, lets Imagine having to choose one of these two houses to live in:

Option 1:

A well-furnished apartment in a neighbourhood of high-rise buildings driven by real estate trends for modern appeal. Built with multiple floors of uniform repetitive layouts without any inputs from you or the other residents. Outside, isolated neighbours, impersonal city interactions and long hours of driving. To survive here, getting to work, and every errand—grocery trips, school runs—requires a car.

So returning home, you go from the basement parking lot into the lift, into your lobby and then straight into your apartment. Sound familiar?

Simply put, your daily routine is: from city navigation to car, to lift, to your apartment…and vice versa… With minimal or zero human connections. 

This is Developer-Led Housing: Ready-made, cookie-cutter housing. Lacking communal engagement and is based on a commoditised housing approach... With little attention to community building. 

Option 2:

Your home is a decent apartment within a neighbourhood of low/medium-rise buildings situated along existing infrastructure/adjoining communities. Mixed-income housing planned and co-designed by residents to reflect common uniformity while retaining personal preferences for individual homes. Every space designed with input from you and the other people who live there, fostering a true sense of belonging. From shared roof-top gardens, buzzing with neighbours, to your children playing with other kids, it feels alive—warm, connected, and personal.

When you return home, you step into a vibrant community that feels alive. A balanced blend of community and personalization. It doesn't even matter that you don't have a car, everything you need (groceries, parks, public utilities) is within walking distance.

This is People-Led Housing: Housing made to meet your needs—not market trends. Prioritizes people and combines community goals with personalization to achieve the triple-bottom-line sustainability goals: financial, ecological, and social...Slow and rarely controllable.

The difference? Both cater to market demands. While the Developer-led housing prioritizes profit —with little thought for community or connection, the People-led housing is focused on creating spaces that are liveable, sustainable for the people that live in them.

The Point?

It's convenient to indulge a ‘this’ OR ‘that’ argument that would leave us exactly where we are with no progress. However, we could look into how we can have ‘this’ AND ‘that’.

This is what differentiates PetitHaus, we believe that the main ingredient to solving the housing crisis is by putting people first. But if we must really make a breakthrough in the fight against homelessness, we must combine this with the  the ‘developer’ model. Personalization, heritage and affordability in a complimentary blend with the scalability of the developer-style housing.

Thankfully, the Houthavens already did this, and its lessons inspire us.

A mini-city neighbourhood of modern housing that combines sustainable design with historic inspiration, as a model for tackling urban housing challenges.

‍

The People-Led Strategy: A Case Study of Houthavens

The new Amsterdam neighbourhood, an interestingly innovative waterfront district embodies this significance. A mini-city neighbourhood of modern housing that combines sustainable design with historic inspiration, providing a model for tackling urban housing challenges, a template that African cities (including Nigeria's) can successfully adopt. 

‍

Here, we explore key strategies from Houthavens’ design and development and how these approaches could address Nigeria’s housing crisis.

1. Combining Historical Aesthetics with Modern Needs

Houthavens takes inspiration from Amsterdam’s past, recreating the charm of historic canal houses, warehouses, and Renaissance-style buildings with a modern, eco-conscious twist. Each island is distinct yet harmonizes with the others, creating a diverse, attractive environment.

Practical Lesson for Nigeria: Leveraging Nigeria’s rich architectural history—like Yoruba courtyard layouts or Hausa earth-building techniques—while introducing sustainable, modern materials, will help us create personal homes that are not only affordable but also retain cultural relevance/heritage.

‍

2. Prioritizing Sustainability in Urban Design

One of the neighbourhood’s standout features is its sustainable design, including energy-efficient buildings, recycled materials, and concealed parking that minimizes emissions. Timber-inspired designs on Libau Island show how renewable materials can serve as both functional and aesthetic elements in housing projects. 

For Nigerian cities grappling with rising emissions, adopting such sustainable practices is vital. Utilizing renewable materials, local resources, and sustainable design principles can ensure long-lasting, eco-friendly housing. Housing projects can emphasize the use of local, renewable resources like bamboo and clay, alongside solar energy systems, which can reduce dependency on imported materials and lower costs.

‍

3. Innovative Housing Typologies for Inclusivity

The development balances luxury housing with affordable units, creating inclusive communities. By interweaving different housing types, including social housing inspired by the city’s history and architecture, it ensures a diverse mix of residents. 

For Nigerian cities, this inclusive model offers a roadmap for reducing housing inequality by integrating social housing within mixed-income developments.

Developments can be designed to include affordable housing that caters to various income levels while ensuring aesthetic and structural quality. For example, PetitHaus’ community-oriented neighbourhoods can incorporate affordable units alongside market-rate housing.

‍

4. Blending Functionality and Community Space

The design of Houthavens emphasizes pedestrian pathways and community green spaces, which help create a neighbourhood feel even in a high-density area. Car traffic is kept underground, promoting air quality and walkability. 

Nigerian cities can benefit from similar zoning principles, emphasizing pedestrian-friendly areas and communal spaces to encourage social interaction and improve living conditions.

We can prioritise pedestrian-friendly zones and green spaces within developments, along with dedicated areas for marketplaces and social events, which will foster a stronger sense of community, even in dense urban settings.

‍

5. Encouraging Customization in Housing Units

Super Lofts and modular designs allow residents to personalize their living spaces while reducing construction costs through prefabricated components. This flexibility gives residents ownership of their space while providing affordable, adaptable housing. 

Here in Nigeria, modular housing offers a practical solution for quickly building cost-effective homes that can adapt to families’ changing needs. This modular model will help us incorporate adjustable layouts, enabling residents to modify their homes as their needs evolve. 

Local developers could adopt these strategies to provide high-quality, adaptable homes that reduce construction time and expense.

Conclusion: A Sustainable Blueprint for Nigeria’s Urban Future

The Houthavens illustrates how thoughtful, inclusive, and sustainable urban design can address complex housing challenges. 

Borrowing these principles to apply to the Nigerian context—integrating cultural heritage, sustainability, inclusivity, and modular design, our cities can provide affordable housing solutions that meet the needs of a rapidly urbanizing population. With a commitment to these innovative strategies, Nigeria can move closer to creating resilient, liveable cities for the future.

Imagine again: A remote eco-home gleaming with solar panels, airtight walls, and top-notch insulation. A truly Zero-energy building, but built in the middle of nowhere. This implies that every errand—grocery trips, school runs—requires a car, literally undoing all its “green & sustainability” ratings.

Now picture a second scenario: A modern, or even retrofitted apartment in a walkable urban centre. Though less advanced in green tech, it’s surrounded by public transit and amenities, significantly reducing transportation emissions. 

The lesson? A building’s energy efficiency isn’t enough for sustainability.
For context, it’s location—how it connects to daily life, its neighbourhood, connecting amenities & surrounding features, together with how it affects human connection —can make or break its environmental impact.
Sustainability thrives on interconnectedness (integration), not segregation.

‍